Sony Remains in the Red

PDFPrintE-mail

Restructuring efforts fail to bring results to a still-ailing Sony as yet-- not with net losses for Q1 2012 reaching $312 million as operating profits decline by -77% Y-o-Y.

SonyTotal sales for the period reach $19.2 billion, a total one can at least partly credit to the folding of Sony Mobile (formerly Sony Ericsson) into the main Sony family.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Home Entertainment and Sound division sees losses reaching $126m due to (what else?) falling TV sales. Overall Sony TV sales are down by -35% Y-o-Y with losses reaching $84m, as the quarter also records low capacity utilisation of S-LCD panels.

The Playstation division also suffers from losses-- $45m, with sales falling by -14.5% Yo-Y due to the handheld PS Vita failing to offset falling PSP and PS3 sales. The imaging division fares better, with growing DSLR and high-end product sales bringing profits worth $160m.

The company claims it is "proceeding steadily with efforts to transform our business structure" as it continues to execute Kaz Hirai's "One Sony" stratey.  Will it manage to reach profitability by 2013?

Go Sony Q1 2012 Results

Acer to Microsoft: "Think Twice" About Surface!

PDFPrintE-mail

That Microsoft upset its OEM partners by producing a tablet by itself is not really news-- so what Acer CEO J.T. Wang tells the Financial Times about the Surface only provides further confirmation.

JT WangWang believes the Surfaces will be "negative for the worldwide ecosystem" causing other vendors to "take a negative reaction." He nearly begs Microsoft to "...think it over... please think twice."

"If Microsoft is going to do hardware business, what should we do? Should we still rely on Microsoft, or should we find other alternatives?" Wang continues.

Back in June reports emerged on how Microsoft kept the Surface a closely guarded secret, letting other vendors know about the tablet only 3 days before the official launch. A bit like what Apple does, basically. But can it really do that? After all, while Apple works by itself (and can really do whatever it wants) Microsoft still depends on its OEM partners around the globe.

The Microsoft 10-K report filed on July 2012 admits the Surface might have upset OEM partners, saying "our Surface devices will compete with products made by our OEM partners, which may affect their commitment to our platform."

Then again, with tablets booming (even some of the non-iPad ones) while PCs remain flat, can Microsoft afford to ignore Windows-based tablets? Also, can it really trust its partners (HP, Acer, Dell, etc) with its tablet dreams? We will only know the success (or lack thereof) the Surface will bring come launch day on October 2012.

Go Acer Chief Takes Aim at Microsoft Surface (FT.com, registration required)

Go Microsoft 10-K Form Filing

VR Headset Turns Heads

PDFPrintE-mail

Do 21st century gamers still care for virtual reality (VR) headsets? Maybe they do, judging from the interest spurred by the Rift-- the latest attempt at head-mounted displays from newly-formed company Oculus.

Oculus RiftProof of such interest comes through Kickstarter, which Oculus are using for crowd-sourced funding. Unlike most Kickstarter campaigns, Oculus only "sells" early developer kits through the service-- managing to get over $1 million (with around 3500 sponsors pledging $300 for a single dev kit) in less than a week.

Each dev kit (available as in either assembled or slightly cheaper build-it-yourself form) comes with access to the Oculus Developer Center, as well as a copy of Doom 3 BFG Edition for PC.

What puts the Rift apart from previous, failed attempts at head-mounted displays? Apart from technology (the company promises " a truly immersive experience "), what the Rift really has is interest from games developers. These include big names such as Doom creator John Carmack, Epic founder Cliff Bleszinski and Valve president Gabe Newell.

The tech specs are also interesting, mind-- head tracking offering "ultra low" latencies and 6-degrees of freedom, a 110-degree field of vision and resolutions of up to 1280x800 (640x800 per eye). Inputs come through DVI, HDMI and USB (no VGA) and it runs on either PCs or mobile devices.

A consumer version of the Rift is, as Oculus puts it, "still a ways down the road," but the interest shown from developers should in the least generate a fairly interesting finished product. Or one that is better than the many attempts at VR we've seen in the past... Virtual Boy, anyone?

Go Oculus Rift

Strategy Analytics: 2012 W. European CE Spending "Flat"

PDFPrintE-mail

CE spending in W. Europe will remain flat in 2012 according to Strategy Analytics, as the Eurozone crisis continues to crunch on consumers' spending power.

Customers will not stop spending on CE entirely, mind-- purchasing will continue, especially on devices eliminating the need for multiple dedicated devices. Just not enough to drive growth within the region.

Strategy Analytics CE spending

On the global front hand analyst predicts WW 2012 CE revenues will grow by 5% and reach $790 billion in value, with mobile devices (tablets, smartphones and laptops) as chief drivers.

While global tablet growth remains "spectacular," Strategy Analytics reports laptops will still account for the majority of 2012 mobile PC sales. How come? Notebooks and ultrabooks still offer better productivity functions than tablets.

Ultrabooks should also see growth soon, accounting for 10% of 2012 laptop sales before making up to 70% of total laptop sales by 2016.

Go Global CE Industry Revenue to Grow 5% in 2012 (Strategy Analytics)

RIM Thinks About Licensing BlackBerry

PDFPrintE-mail

With BlackBerry 10 delayed until Q1 2013 and plenty of financial troubles, RIM considers desperate measures-- CEO Thorsten Heins tells The Telegraph the company is looking into licensing BB10 to 3rd party vendors.

RIM CEO"You could think about us building a reference system, and then basically licensing that reference design, have others build the hardware around it – either it’s a BlackBerry or it’s something else being built on the BlackBerry platform,” Heins says in an interview.

The reasoning behind the thoughts of BlackBerry licensing mainly involves economies of scale-- RIM admits it cannot compete against "the guys who crank out 60 handsets a year" even if it is in need of differentiation within the BlackBerry platform.

Licensing BB10 might also help RIM make lower-cost handsets aiming at growing emerging markets outside W. Europe and the US.

Either way, BB10 is make-or-break for RIM-- We will know either of which will happen once BB10 launches (on 2 flagship devices) sometime around Q1 2013.

Go "BlackBerry is Not in a Through"-- RIM CEO Thorsten Heins Interview (The Telegraph)

Page 749 of 993